Astronomical Data Center

ADCADC/CDS Standard Document for Catalog:
/journal_tables/ApJS/123/79/

The following is the "ReadMe" document that describes this ADC catalog. You can access the files described here in three ways:

1. Use the ADC Data Viewer Suite to visualize the data. [preview
2. Get the data files via anonymous FTP. (See Note.) [ftp


J/ApJS/123/79       Third EGRET catalog (3EG)                (Hartman+, 1999)
================================================================================
The third EGRET catalog of high-energy gamma-ray sources.
    Hartman R.C., Bertsch D.L., Bloom S.D., Chen A.W., Deines-Jones P.,
    Esposito J.A., Fichtel C.E., Friedlander D.P., Hunter S.D.,
    McDonald L.M., Sreekumar P., Thompson D.J., Jones B.B., Lin Y.C.,
    Michelson P.F., Nolan P.L., Tompkins W.F., Kanbach G.,
    Mayer-Hasselwander H.A., Mucke A., Pohl M., Reimer O., Kniffen D.A.,
    Schneid E.J., Von Montigny C., Mukherjee R., Dingus B.L.
   <Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 123, 79 (1999)>
   =1999ApJS..123...79H      (SIMBAD/NED BibCode)
================================================================================
ADC_Keywords: Gamma rays
Mission_Name: CGRO
Keywords: catalogs - galaxies: active - gamma rays: observations -
          pulsars: general - Sun: flares

Description:
    The third  catalog of  high-energy gamma-ray  sources detected  by the
    EGRET telescope  on the Compton Gamma  Ray Observatory (3EG)  includes
    data from  1991 April 22 to 1995 October 3 (cycles  1, 2, 3, and 4  of
    the mission). In addition to including more data than the second EGRET
    catalog  and its supplement,  this catalog uses completely reprocessed
    data to correct  a number of  mostly minimal errors  and problems.  14
    sources (3 from the Supplement)  listed  in  Table  6  below  are  not
    appearing in the 3EG.

    The 271 sources  (E>100 MeV)  in  the catalog include  the single 1991
    solar flare bright enough to be  detected  as  a  source,   the  Large
    Magellanic  Cloud,  five pulsars,  one probable radio galaxy detection
    (Cen  A),  and 66  high-confidence identifications of  blazars (BL Lac
    objects,   flat-spectrum radio quasars,  or unidentified flat-spectrum
    radio sources).  In  addition,  27  lower confidence  potential blazar
    identifications are noted.  Finally,  the catalog contains 170 sources
    not yet identified firmly  with  known  objects,   although  potential
    identifications have been suggested for a number of those.

    This catalog supersedes the 2EG (Cat. <J/ApJS/101/259>)
    and its supplement (Cat. <J/ApJS/107/227>).

File Summary:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  FileName        Lrecl  Records   Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ReadMe             80        .   This file
3eg.dat           154      271   Third EGRET Source Catalog (table 4)
fluxes.dat         50     5245   Third EGRET Source Catalog, fluxes (table 4)
table1.dat         37      169   EGRET Viewing Periods
notes.dat          80      112   Individual notes
refs.dat           88       27   References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

See also:
   J/ApJS/101/259 : The second EGRET catalog (Thompson+ 1995)
   J/ApJS/107/227 : Supplement to Second EGRET Catalog (Thompson+ 1996)
   http://cossc.gsfc.nasa.gov/cossc/egret/ : EGRET catalogs

Byte-by-byte Description of file: 3eg.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Bytes Format Units   Label      Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   1- 14  A14   ---     3EG        3EG name (3EG Jhhmm+ddmm)
  16- 21  F6.2  deg     RAdeg      Right ascension (J2000)
  23- 28  F6.2  deg     DEdeg      Declination (J2000)
  30- 35  F6.2  deg     GLON       Galactic longitude
  37- 42  F6.2  deg     GLAT       Galactic latitude
  44- 48  F5.3  deg     theta95    Radius of the circle containing the same
                                    solid angle as the 95% confidence contour
      49  A1    ---   n_theta95    [*] *: value was obtained by multiplying the
                                    68% radius by 1.62. This was necessary in
                                    cases of unclosed or extremely irregular 95%
                                    contours.
  51- 54  F4.2  ---     Sp-Index   ? Photon spectral index in F(E)~E-^Sp-Index^
  56- 59  F4.2  ---   e_Sp-Index   ? rms uncertainty on Sp-Index
      60  A1    ---   n_Sp-Index   [BF] B: Break, F: Features
      63  A1    ---     ID         [PGSAa] Identification code (1)
  65- 70  A6    ---     Note       [@EemC, ] Notes (2)
  72- 81  A10   ---   r_ID         References detailed in file "refs.dat"
  83- 84  A2    ---   l_z          [>= ~] Limit flag on z
  85- 90  F6.4  ---     z          ? Redshift (AGNs only)
      91  A1    ---   u_z          [?] Uncertainty flag on z
  93-162  A70   ---     OtherNames Other names (3)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): P, pulsar (indicates detection of pulsed gamma radiation);
          G, galaxy (LMC only);
          S, solar flare;
          A, active galactic nucleus;
          a, possible active galactic nucleus.
              The possible AGN identifications are questionable, either because
              the objects have low radio flux density (<300 mJy) or because they
              lie outside the 95% uncertainty contour, sometimes even outside
              the 99% contour (but within the position determination map).
              Note that this is similar to the notation used in 2EG (Cat.
              <J/ApJS/101/259>) and 2EGS (Cat. <J/ApJS/107/227>) (albeit looser
              than the definition of "marginal" used in 2EG and 2EGS), but
              different from that used in the first EGRET catalog (Fichtel et
              al. 1994ApJS...94..551F), which distinguished identifications by
              their statistical significance.
Note (2): @: Note in notes.dat file
          E: extended source (applies only to the Large Magellanic Cloud);
         em: possibly extended source or multiple sources (based on source
              location maps inconsistent with a single point source or poor fit
              to the calibrated PSF, from the observation or sum of observations
              presented in the first entry for the source);
          C: source confusion may affect flux, significance, or position.
              (Below-threshold excesses are considered in assigning this symbol,
              so some weak sources may be designated as confused despite having
              no other catalog sources nearby, e.g., in Fig. 4.)
          Sources with no entry (other than @) in this column are consistent
           with the EGRET PSF for a single source.
Note (3): Possible identifications are followed by "?"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Byte-by-byte Description of file: fluxes.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Bytes Format Units         Label  Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   1- 14  A14   ---           3EG    3EG name (3EG Jhhmm+ddmm)
      15  A1    ---         n_3EG    [*] *: Maximum flux detected
      17  A1    ---         l_F      Limit flag on F (95% confidence upper
                                       limit for (TS)^1/2^<2)
  18- 23  F6.1 10-8ph/cm2/s   F      Flux (E>100MeV) (1)
  25- 29  F5.1 10-8ph/cm2/s e_F      ? rms uncertainty on F ({DELTA}F)
      31  A1    ---         l_Count  Limit flag on Count
  32- 36  I5    ct            Count  Number of >100 MeV photons represented by
                                      the flux or upper limit.
  38- 42  F5.1  ---           TS1/2  Statistical significance of the >100 MeV
                                      detection.
  44- 50  A7    ---           VP     Viewing period of the specific catalog
                                       line (2)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): For each observation (or sum of observations) with (TS)^1/2^>=2,
           the excess is presented as a flux with its uncertainty. Note that
           for the second EGRET catalog, (TS)^1/2^>=3 was used.
           For (TS)^1/2^<2, the result is presented as a 95% confidence upper
           limit, derived as described in Sect. 3.2 of Mattox et al.
           (1996ApJ...461..396M). Each analysis of a viewing period (or sum of
           viewing periods) was carried out independently; therefore, the sum of
           counts from individual viewing periods for a specific source does not
           necessarily match closely the counts from a summed map.
          To limit the length of the catalog, upper limits with little or no
           significance are deleted.
          First, if the maximum flux detected from a source is F, upper limits
           above F+e_F are deleted.
          Second, where two or more short viewing periods have been added
           together, upper limits for the individual viewing periods have been
           deleted if they are greater than F+e_F (or the upper limit) for the
           summed interval.
          The flux uncertainties and upper limits shown are statistical only.
           For all except the brightest sources or those in confused regions,
           the statistical uncertainty is larger than any systematic
           uncertainties. Systematic effects include the uncertainty in the
           calibration (Thompson et al., 1993ApJS...86..629T; Esposito et al.,
           1999, ApJ, in press) as a function of energy and angle within the
           instrument, and the gradual change in operating performance of EGRET
           as the spark chamber gas ages. A first-order correction to this
           latter effect has been included. At this time, we recommend that a
           residual uncertainty of 10% should be attached to any flux value, in
           addition to the statistical uncertainty. Sources in confused regions
           may also have significant uncertainties due to the overlapping PSFs.
           The fluxes for such sources should not be considered independent of
           each other, particularly in searching for time variability.
          The flux F for most sources was determined assuming a photon
           spectral index of 2. If the spectral index {gamma} (see below)
           differs substantially from 2.0, some additional error should be
           assumed for the flux F.
          An approximate flux density at 400 MeV (~10^23^Hz), in units of
           picojanskys, can be obtained by multiplying the value of F
           shown by 1.7. The fractional uncertainty in the flux density is
           e_F/F. The approximations used in deriving the factor 1.7 are
           discussed in 2EGS (Cat. <J/ApJS/107/227>).
Note (2): The results are for summed maps for cycle 1 (denoted P1),
           cycle 2 (P2), cycle 3 (P3), cycle 4 (P4), cycles 1 + 2 (P12),
           cycles 3 + 4 (P34), cycles 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 (P1234), and for all viewing
           periods meeting the following criteria: (1) the source was within
           30{deg} of the EGRET pointing direction; and (2) the exposure was
           large enough to derive a meaningful flux or upper limit. (There are
           two exceptions to the 30{deg} cutoff: (a) the highest significance
           detection of 3EG J1200+2847 was in viewing period 206.0, in which the
           source was 31{deg} from the axis, and (b) viewing periods 403.0,
           403.5, 411.1, and 411.5 were carried out with EGRET in narrow
           field-of-view mode, so a cutoff of 19{deg} from the pointing
           direction was used.) Also presented are results for sums of 2-6
           individual viewing periods close in time and with nearly identical
           pointing directions.
          P1234 represents the sum of cycles 1, 2, 3, and 4, etc.; 0.2+ is the
           sum of viewing periods 0.20.5, all of which covered roughly the same
           region of the sky during the verification phase of the mission.
          Entries ending in "+" are for sums of 2-6 viewing periods, defined
            in table 5.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Byte-by-byte Description of file: table1.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Bytes Format    Units   Label     Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   1-  5  F5.1     ---     VP        Viewing period designation
   7- 14  A8    "DD/MM/YY" Start     Starting date
  16- 23  A8    "DD/MM/YY" End       Ending date
  25- 30  F6.2     deg     GLON      Galactic longitude
  32- 37  F6.2     deg     GLAT      Galactic latitude
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Byte-by-byte Description of file: notes.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Bytes Format Units   Label     Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   1- 14  A14   ---     3EG       Source designation
  16- 89  A74   ---     Note      Text of the note
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Byte-by-byte Description of file: refs.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Bytes Format Units   Label     Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   1-  2  I2    ---     RefNo     Reference number
   4- 88  A85   ---     Text      Text of reference, including the
                                    19-digit bibcode.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table 5: EGRET Combined Viewing Periods
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 CVP              Viewing Periods Combined
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 0.2+         0.2 +   0.3 +   0.4 + 0.5
 24.+        24.0 +  24.5
 26.+        26.0 +  28.0
 36.+        36.0 +  36.5
 201.+      201.0 + 202.0
 Virgo2     204.0 + 205.0 + 206.0
 215.+      215.0 + 217.0
 223.+      223.0 + 226.0
 227.+      227.0 + 228.0
 229.+      229.0 + 229.5
 230.+      230.0 + 230.5
 302.+      302.0 + 303.2 + 303.7
 Virgo3a    304.0 + 305.0 + 306.0 + 307.0 + 308.0 + 308.6
 Virgo3b    311.0 + 311.6 + 312.0 + 313.0
 314.+      314.0 + 315.0
 319.+      319.0 + 319.5
 321.+      321.1 + 321.5
 328.+      328.0 + 331.0 + 331.5 + 333.0
 330.+      330.0 + 332.0
 335.+      335.0 + 335.5
 402.+      402.0 + 402.5
 Virgo4     405.0 + 406.0 + 407.0 + 408.0
 411.+      411.1 + 411.5
 412.+      412.0 + 413.0
 419.+      419.1 + 419.5
 421.+      421.0 + 422.0 + 423.0
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Table 6: Sources from the Second EGRET Catalog AND Supplement not Appearing
          in the Third Catalog
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Source           (TS)^1/2^   Present
                   in 2EG     Analysis
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 2EG J0403+3357      4.5       3.2
 2EG J0426+6618      4.5       3.2
 2EGS J0500+5902     4.0       3.3
 2EGS J0552-1026     4.3       3.5
 2EG J1136-0414      4.1       3.2
 2EGS J1236-0416     4.2       3.9+
 2EG J1239+0441      6.3       3.9 a
 2EG J1314+5151      4.0       3.6
 2EG J1430+5356      4.1       3.8
 2EG J1443-6040      5.2       4.3
 2EG J1631-2845      6.0       3.9 b
 2EG J1709-0350      4.3       3.9+
 2EG J1815+2950      4.0       3.8
 2EG J2027+1054      4.4       2.9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Notes: a: Counts split between 3EG J1236+0457 and a source below the catalog
            threshold.
        b: Counts split between 3EG J1625-2955, 3EG J1638-2749, and a source
            below the catalog threshold.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

History: From ApJS electronic version
================================================================================
(End)                                          Patricia Bauer [CDS]  03-Aug-1999

Go to ADC Home Page