Astronomical Data Center

ADCADC/CDS Standard Document for Catalog:
/journal_tables/A+AS/129/583/

The following is the "ReadMe" document that describes this ADC catalog. You can access the files described here in three ways:

1. Use the ADC Data Viewer Suite to visualize the data. [preview
2. Get the data files via anonymous FTP. (See Note.) [ftp


J/A+AS/129/583      Hubble Deep Field surface photometry (Fasano+ 1998)
================================================================================
Surface photometry of early-type galaxies in the Hubble Deep Field
       Fasano G., Filippi M., Bertola F.
      <Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 129, 583 (1998)>
      =1998A&AS..129..583F      (SIMBAD/NED BibCode)
================================================================================
ADC_Keywords: Galaxies, photometry ; Photometry, surface
Keywords: galaxies : elliptical and lenticular,
          galaxies: fundamental parameters, galaxies: photometry
Mission_Name: HST

Abstract:
   The detailed surface photometry of a sample of early-type galaxies in
   the Hubble Deep Field is presented as part of a long-term project aimed
   to settle strong observational constraints to the theories modelling the
   evolution of elliptical galaxies from the early stages.
   The sample has been extracted, in the V_606_ band, from the database
    provided by the ESO-STECF-HDF Group (Couch, 1996,
    <http://ecf.hq.eso.org>). The selection criteria involve the total
    magnitude, the number of pixels detected above the background level
    and an automatic star/galaxy classifier. Moreover, form visual
    inspection of the frames, we excluded the galaxies showing unambiguous
    late-type morphology. The analysis of the luminosity and geometrical
    profiles, carried out on the 162 candidates obeying our selection
    criteria, resulted in a list of 99 'bona fide' early-type galaxies,
    for which accurate total magnitudes and effective radii were computed
    on the basis of the equivalent luminosity profiles. The comparison
    with the magnitudes given by Williams et al. (1996,
    Cat. <J/AJ/112/1335>) indicates that the automated photometry tends to
    underestimate the total luminosity of the ellipticals. The luminosity
    profiles of most of galaxies in our sample follow fairly well the
    de~Vaucouleurs law ('Normal' profiles). However, a relevant fraction
    of galaxies, even following the r^1/4^ law in the main body light
    distribution, exhibit in the inner region a flattening of the
    luminosity profile not attributable to the PSF (`Flat' profiles) or,
    in some cases, a complex (multi-nucleus) structure (`Merger'
    profiles). A statistically significant correlation is found between
    the shapes of the luminosity profiles and the ellipticity
    distribution. In particular, the average ellipticity of galaxies
    belonging to the `Flat' and `Merger' classes is significantly higher
    than that of the `Normal' galaxies. Finally, even taken into account
    the relevant uncertainty of the outer position angle profiles, the
    amount of isophotal twisting of HDF ellipticals turns out to be
    significantly larger with respect to that of the local samples.

File Summary:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 FileName    Lrecl    Records    Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ReadMe          80          .    This file
name.dat        50         99    List of the 99 galaxies in the sample
table1.dat     140       2674    Galaxy parameters
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

See also:
    J/AJ/112/1335 : Hubble Deep Field observations (Williams+ 1996)

Byte-by-byte Description of file: name.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Bytes Format Units   Label     Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   1- 10  A10   ---     Name      Galaxy name
  12- 13  I2    h       RAh       Right ascension (2000.0)
  15- 16  I2    min     RAm       Right ascension (2000.0)
  18- 21  F4.1  s       RAs       Right ascension (2000.0)
      23  A1    ---     DE-       Declination sign
  24- 25  I2    deg     DEd       Declination (2000.0)
  27- 28  I2    arcmin  DEm       Declination (2000.0)
  30- 31  I2    arcsec  DEs       Declination (2000.0)
  33- 50  A18   ---     WBD96     Simbad denomination ([WBD96] N-NNN.nnnn)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Byte-by-byte Description of file: table1.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Bytes  Format    Units     Label   Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   1- 10  A10       ---       Name    Galaxy name
  12- 17  F6.3   mag/arcsec2  mag     V_606 surface brightness (ST system)
  19- 25  F7.2      pix       Xpos    X coord. of the center
  27- 33  F7.2      pix       Ypos    Y coord. of the center
  36- 40  F5.2     arcsec     Radius  Radius along the major axis
  42- 47  F6.4      ---       Eps     Ellipticity = 1-b/a
  49- 54  F6.1      deg       PA      [-211/165] Position Angle from N to W
  56- 61  F6.2      0.1       Sin3    ?=99.00 {3[theta] term in Fourier
                                        expansion}*10 (1)
  63- 68  F6.2      0.1       Cos3    ?=99.00 {3[theta] term in Fourier
                                         expansion}*10 (1)
  70- 75  F6.2      0.1       Sin4    ?=99.00 {4[theta] term in Fourier
                                         expansion}*10 (1)
  77- 82  F6.2      0.1       Cos4    ?=99.00 {4[theta] term in Fourier
                                         expansion}*10 (1)
  84- 88  F5.3      ---     e_Eps     Estimated error of the ellipticity
  90- 95  F6.2      deg     e_PA      Estimated error of the position angle
  97-104  E8.2      0.1     e_Sin3    Estimated error of Sin3
 106-113  E8.2      0.1     e_Cos3    Estimated error of Cos3
 115-122  E8.2      0.1     e_Sin4    Estimated error of Sin4
 124-131  E8.2      0.1     e_Cos4    Estimated error of Cos4
 133-140  E8.2 mag/arcsec2  e_mag     Estimated error of surface brightness
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): 99.00 --> data are not available
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Acknowledgements: Gianni Fasano <gfasano@leda.pd.astro.it>
================================================================================
(End)                                         Patricia Bauer [CDS]   11-Dec-1997

Go to ADC Home Page