Astronomical Data Center

ADCADC/CDS Standard Document for Catalog:
/journal_tables/ApJS/131/561/

The following is the "ReadMe" document that describes this ADC catalog. You can access the files described here in three ways:

1. Use the ADC Data Viewer Suite to visualize the data. [preview
2. Get the data files via anonymous FTP. (See Note.) [ftp


J/ApJS/131/561    Double stars with PISCO at Pic du midi    (Scardia+, 2000)
================================================================================
Speckle observations of double stars with PISCO at Pic du midi:
measurements in 1998.
    Scardia M., Prieur J.-L., Aristidi E., Koechlin L.
      <Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 131, 561 (2000)>
      =2000ApJS..131..561S      (SIMBAD/NED BibCode)
================================================================================
ADC_Keywords: Stars, double and multiple
Keywords: astrometry - binaries: visual - stars: fundamental parameters

Abstract:
    We present astrometric measurements of binary stars based on speckle
    observations of 164 independent sequences of observations (~10^4^
    frames each) made with the PISCO speckle camera at Pic du Midi. These
    measurements concern 147 objects, of which 134 were found to be double
    with a separation in the range 0.1"-1.0". These objects were mainly
    selected among grade 3 orbits to improve the accuracy of their orbits
    and to constrain their masses. We discovered the binarity of 59 Aql
    with an angular separation of 0.09"+/-0.01".

File Summary:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 FileName      Lrecl  Records   Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ReadMe            80        .   This file
table1.dat       133      165   Relative Astrometric Data of the Binary Stars
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

See also:
  J/A+AS/134/545 : Double star measurements 1995-1997 (Aristidi+ 1999)
  J/A+AS/105/503 : Binary star speckle measurements (Balega+ 1994)
  J/A+AS/140/287 : 1992-1997 binary star speckle measurements (Balega+, 1999)
  J/AJ/111/370   : Orbits of 37 close visual systems (Hartkopf+ 1996)
  J/AJ/117/548   : 1997 WIYN binary stars speckle observations (Horch+, 1999)
  J/AJ/106/352   : Speckle observations of binary stars VIII (Hartkopf+ 1993)
  J/AJ/106/637   : ICCD speckle observations. IX (Mason+, 1993)
  J/AJ/106/1639  : Speckle observations of binary stars (McAlister+ 1993)
  J/AJ/108/2299  : ICCD speckle obs. of binary stars. XI. (Hartkopf+ 1994)
  J/AJ/111/393   : Speckle observations of binary stars. XII (Al-Shukri+ 1996)
  J/AJ/111/936   : ICCD Speckle obs. of binary stars. XIII (Hartkopf+ 1996)
  J/AJ/119/3084  : ICCD speckle obs. of binary stars. XXIII. (Hartkopf+, 2000)

Byte-by-byte Description of file: table1.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Bytes Format Units    Label   Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   1- 10  A10   ----     WDS     WDS designation (based in J2000 positions)
  12- 38  A27   ---      Names   Other names
  40- 41  I2    mm       FL      ? Focal length of the eyepiece used as imaging
                                    lens in the magnification wheel
  43- 47  A5    ---      Filt    Filter (1)
  49- 56  F8.3  yr       Epoch   ? Epoch n Besselian years
  58- 60  F3.1  arcsec   Seeing  ? FWHM seeing (2)
  62- 66  F5.3  arcsec   rho     ? Angular separation
  68- 72  F5.3  arcsec e_rho     ? rms uncertainty on rho
  74- 78  F5.1  deg      PA      ? Position angle
  80- 82  F3.1  deg    e_PA      ? rms uncertainty on PA
      83  A1    ---    n_PA      [*] Note on PA (3)
  85-134  A50   ---      Com     Comments (4)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): Characteristics of the Filters Used
           ------------------------------------------
           Name     Central wavelength  Bandwidth
                         (nm)             (nm)
           ------------------------------------------
             B            447              47
             O III        501              11
             V            530              57
             R            644              70
             RL           743              69
             W            650             418
           ------------------------------------------
       "W" means "White" since no filter has been used. In that case,
       the bandwidth selection was done with the ICCD response only.
Note (2): FWHM seeing, which was measured on the long integration obtained by
           adding all the elementary frames from that sequence
Note (3): The position angles have a 180{deg} ambiguity except when asterisked
           (for which a triple correlation method removed this ambiguity). The
           origin of the orbits used in this table is indicated in the third
           column with the name of the author and the year of the calculation.
           Additional details about these orbits can be obtained directly from
           those authors or from the author of this paper.
Note (4): Comments:
    "(F)": The measurement was done in the Fourier space by fitting a model to
            the fringes instead of measuring the position of the secondary peaks
            of the autocorrelation function. This was preferentially done for
            the closest binaries when the angular separation was less than 0.15"
            because it gives a greater accuracy in this case.
    "(F=)": The two methods (Fourier and autocorrelation) gave exactly the same
             result.
 "Fuzzy," "faint contrast": These terms are related to the secondary peaks of
    the autocorrelation function.
  "Artifacts close to the X-axis": This phrase is to note the presence of some
      artifacts on the autocorrelation caused by the response of the ICCD to
      individual photons. In some cases the corresponding pattern was close to
      the secondary peaks of the binary and increased the measurement errors.
      When the artifacts were superimposed on these peaks (i.e., for PA~100{deg}
      or PA~280{deg}), we used the Fourier fitting method.
  "Possible 1800 ambiguity": This means that the quadrant determination
      (see the previous paragraph) was noisy and the result is uncertain.
  For WDS 16563+6502, the two components were so widely separated that it was
      also possible to do a direct measurement on the long integration.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

History:
    Frome ApJS electronic version

================================================================================
(End)                         James Marcout, Patricia Bauer [CDS]    02-Feb-2001

Go to ADC Home Page